linux-kernel - Duplication of vdso and vsyscall code?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4ACFA80E.7050701@goop.org>
Date:	Fri, 09 Oct 2009 14:15:58 -0700
From:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Duplication of vdso and vsyscall code?

arch/x86/kernel/vsyscall_64.c implements vgettimeofday and vgetcpu. 
(And vtime)

arch/x86/vdso/vclock_gettime.c implements __vdso_gettimeofday (and
__vdso_clock_gettime), and vgetcpu.c has __vdso_getcpu.

These appear to be functionally identical duplicate definitions.   I
don't understand the history here to know how we came to get two sets of
these functions, but surely we can share the same code for both of these?

Thanks,
    J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/