linux-kernel - Re: Linux guest domain with two vnets bound to the same vswitch experiences hung in bootup (sun

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 09 Oct 2009 16:21:20 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	heyongli@...il.com
Cc:	sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux guest domain with two vnets bound to the same vswitch
 experiences hung in bootup (sun_netraT5220)

From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2009 15:08:29 -0700 (PDT)

> Thank you for this bug report and patch, I am looking at
> it now.

I'm trying to figure out how the deadlock can even occur,
and I've failed so far, please help me :-)

See, we always take the VIO and LDC locks in the same order
(VIO then LDC) and always with interrupts disabled, so it is
not possible to deadlock.

The only way we could deadlock is if:

1) There is some path that takes the LDC lock before the VIO one.

2) There is some path that takes either lock with interrupts
   enabled.

And I cannot find any such case.

It might help if you run your test case with lockdep enabled.  It will
find such deadlocks and report them precisely to the kernel logs.

Thank you!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/