[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2009 08:05:23 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Josua Dietze <digidietze@...isberghof.de>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
Hugh Blemings <hugh@...mings.org>
Subject: Re: USB serial regression 2.6.31.1 -> 2.6.31.2
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 11:55:47AM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Am Samstag, 10. Oktober 2009 09:41:01 schrieb Benjamin Herrenschmidt:
> > suspend is a good candidate yeah, autosuspend might be causing something
> > like that, I'll see what I can find. I didn't spot an obvious change to
> > the USB suspend policy between those two kernels, but it could be
> > trigged by one of the numerous changes that went into usb-serial.
>
> Then you can simply test this hunch by switching it off. If that helps
> please recompile with CONFIG_USB_DEBUG enabled?
>
> But I don't understand why the stable series is affected. Autosuspend
> patches didn't go into it, did they Greg?
Not that I can see, no.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists