lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <12F4112206976147A34FEC0277597CCF27A416492F@XCH-NW-15V.nw.nos.boeing.com>
Date:	Fri, 9 Oct 2009 17:34:49 -0700
From:	"Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@...ing.com>
To:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"stable@...nel.org" <stable@...nel.org>
CC:	"stable-review@...nel.org" <stable-review@...nel.org>,
	"torvalds@...ux-foundation.org" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk" <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Sascha Hlusiak <contact@...chahlusiak.de>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
Subject: RE: [patch 37/37] sit: fix off-by-one in ipip6_tunnel_get_prl

Wait a moment - I remember now that this code came
from Yoshifuji, and I believe there was a reason for
the cmax+1. The application is expected to know this
and to post a large enough buffer.

Can we put this on hold until I have had a chance to
check my e-mail archives and my local iproute changes
(will respond on monday)?

Thanks - Fred
fred.l.templin@...ing.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg KH [mailto:gregkh@...e.de]
> Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 4:35 PM
> To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; stable@...nel.org
> Cc: stable-review@...nel.org; torvalds@...ux-foundation.org; akpm@...ux-foundation.org;
> alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk; Sascha Hlusiak; Templin, Fred L; David S. Miller
> Subject: [patch 37/37] sit: fix off-by-one in ipip6_tunnel_get_prl
> 
> 2.6.31-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
> 
> ------------------
> From: Sascha Hlusiak <contact@...chahlusiak.de>
> 
> [ Upstream commit 298bf12ddb25841804f26234a43b89da1b1c0e21 ]
> 
> When requesting all prl entries (kprl.addr == INADDR_ANY) and there are
> more prl entries than there is space passed from userspace, the existing
> code would always copy cmax+1 entries, which is more than can be handled.
> 
> This patch makes the kernel copy only exactly cmax entries.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sascha Hlusiak <contact@...chahlusiak.de>
> Acked-By: Fred L. Templin <Fred.L.Templin@...ing.com>
> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
> ---
>  net/ipv6/sit.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> --- a/net/ipv6/sit.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/sit.c
> @@ -313,7 +313,7 @@ static int ipip6_tunnel_get_prl(struct i
> 
>  	c = 0;
>  	for (prl = t->prl; prl; prl = prl->next) {
> -		if (c > cmax)
> +		if (c >= cmax)
>  			break;
>  		if (kprl.addr != htonl(INADDR_ANY) && prl->addr != kprl.addr)
>  			continue;
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ