[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091011202353.GA5486@nowhere>
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2009 22:23:54 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: perf trace errors
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 02:40:30PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 02:19:28PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > Yeah, there are still some trace events that are not well supported
> > in perf trace, for now... I'll fix that by the time.
>
> Any idea what is the missing part? I tried to understand the code but
> I haven't even managed to grasp the data structures yet.
>
> The weird thing is that these message seem to come from parsing of
> the filters, and a simple trace the whole system trace shouldn't
> really have to set any filters anyway, nor should the filters depdend
> on what trace point you use.
>
> Note that the in addition to all the block trace points also all my
> new xfs tracepoints also give errors from perf trace. Things tend
> to work quite nicely with the ASCII output from the kernel.
>
It's about the trace event format file parsing, especially the format
line:
print fmt: "%d,%d %s %llu + %u [%s]", ((unsigned int) ((REC->dev) >> 20)), ((unsigned int) ((REC->dev) & ((1U << 20)
- 1))), REC->rwbs, (unsigned long long)REC->sector, REC->nr_sector, REC->comm
This is done from tools/perf/util/trace-event-parse.c
It is supposed to handle such cases already, not sure exactly where is
the problem currently, that needs some investigation.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists