[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200910112350.24870.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2009 23:50:24 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arndbergmann@...glemail.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arndbergmann@...glemail.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Vincent Sanders <vince@...tec.co.uk>,
John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
"Sven-Thorsten Dietrich" <sven@...bigcorporation.com>,
Alessio Igor Bogani <abogani@...ware.it>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [patch 11/28] nvram: Drop the bkl from nvram_llseek()
On Sunday 11 October 2009, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> Now I'm adding the ioctl() sites too:
>
> git-grep "\.ioctl *=" | grep -P "^\S+\.c" | wc -l
> 452
>
> Hehe :)
Not all of them, fortunately.
There are various *_operations structures that have a .ioctl pointer.
While there are a lot of struct file_operations with a locked .ioctl
operation, stuff like block_device_operations does not hold the
BKL in .ioctl but in .locked_ioctl.
Arnd <><
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists