[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091011074045.GA6555@elte.hu>
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2009 09:40:45 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Schlichter <thomas.schlichter@....de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@...are.com>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC Patch] use MTRR for write combining if PAT is not
available
* Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> Thomas Schlichter wrote:
>
>> Hmm, my CPU (VIA Nano) seems to support PAT, but Ubuntu disables this
>> feature in its kernel config. I'm using 9.04, but even 9.10 will have PAT
>> disabled:
>
> that sounds like a bad idea. But to each distro their own I suppose.
>
>
>>
>> http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git?p=ubuntu/ubuntu-
>> karmic.git;a=blob;f=debian.master/config/config.common.ubuntu;h=a43cbabd02bfdf5412de6fea232db86aa5d3e742;hb=HEAD
>
>> So, convincing Ubuntu to enable PAT would be a workaround, but I think
>> the problem would still exist and should be fixed.
>
> I think it's time to get rid of CONFIG_PAT at all.. and just have it
> be there. Making 10+ year old CPU features that are essential
> functionality a config option... ... not a good idea to be honest.
Mind sending a patch that makes the configurability of PAT dependent on
EMBEDDED or so? There's still the nopat boot option so it can still be
configured by a distro if it wishes to.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists