linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 15/21] kernel/power/: use pr_<level> and add pr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 11 Oct 2009 10:59:00 +0200
From:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
	linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/21] kernel/power/: use pr_<level> and add pr_fmt(fmt)


> > Here's the same patch redone against -next.
> > 
> > Added #define pr_fmt(fmt) "PM: " fmt
> > Converted printk(KERN_<level> to pr_<level>(
> > Converted printks without KERN_ to pr_info or pr_cont
> > Removed hard coded "PM: " prefix from message strings
> > Added pr_fmt() to __initdata strings
> > Integrated multiple line strings
> > All logging messages are now output prefixed with "PM: "
> 
> Does this patch depend on any other patch that haven't been merged yet?
> 
> I still don't like pr_info(), pr_error() and pr_crit().

Well, rest of kernel uses them, they are shorter, and will save few
bytes  too... so why not?
								Pavel

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/