[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4AD2E8C8.4060205@imap.cc>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 10:28:56 +0200
From: Tilman Schmidt <tilman@...p.cc>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
CC: Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-ppp@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Subject: Re: NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 08
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
[CCing PPP people]
Am 11.10.2009 13:40 schrieb Johannes Berg:
> On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 13:18 +0200, Tilman Schmidt wrote:
>
>> Can you explain a bit more what that message is about?
>> I am encountering it in a completely different context
>> (PPP over ISDN) [...]
>
> Basically, calling netif_rx() with softirqs enabled.
AFAICS that would have to be the netif_rx() call in
ppp_receive_nonmp_frame() [drivers/net/ppp_generic.c#L1791],
called (via others) from the tasklet work function
ppp_sync_process() [drivers/net/ppp_synctty.c#L545].
Should that be changed to the
"if (in_interrupt()) netif_rx(skb) else netif_rx_ni(skb)"
stanza from the linux.kernel.wireless.general thread then?
Thanks,
Tilman
- --
Tilman Schmidt E-Mail: tilman@...p.cc
Bonn, Germany
Diese Nachricht besteht zu 100% aus wiederverwerteten Bits.
Ungeöffnet mindestens haltbar bis: (siehe Rückseite)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFK0ujIQ3+did9BuFsRAtGBAJ9rj2pyQZ75ZKTipLhpICqA3ZvTdQCdHQs/
RmdeOT3TuPZykXJxcHLJCzU=
=87DI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists