linux-kernel - Re: Linux 2.6.32-rc4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20091012094806.GB928@elte.hu>
Date:	Mon, 12 Oct 2009 11:48:06 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.32-rc4


* Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 10:29:50AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Alexey, could you please Cc: affected maintainers in the future, so that 
> > we can avoid such problems?
> 
> And can you merge fallout your compile farm found into single 
> "fallout" patch. Inflating number of commits doesn't really help.

i found them separately and fixed them gradually so obviously they are 
separate commits done separately.

It's useful to have patches split up in general, so that maintainers can 
pick up each fix independently. (Also, should any of them be in the need 
of reverting it's far easier to do it than to revert a mega patch.)

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/