[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091012100131.GA3007@balbir.in.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 15:31:31 +0530
From: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Arun R Bharadwaj <arun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@...ibm.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v8 PATCH 0/8]: cpuidle: Cleanup cpuidle/ Introduce cpuidle to
POWER
* Arun R B <arun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> [2009-10-08 15:18:28]:
> Hi
>
> Please consider this for inclusion into the testing tree.
>
> This patchset introduces cpuidle infrastructure to POWER, prototyping
> for pSeries, and also does a major refactoring of current x86 idle
> power management and a cleanup of cpuidle infrastructure.
>
> Earlier discussions on the same can be found at:
>
> v7 --> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/10/6/278
> v6 --> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/9/22/180
> v5 --> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/9/22/26
> v4 --> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/9/1/133
> v3 --> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/8/27/124
> v2 --> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/8/26/233
> v1 --> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/8/19/150
>
>
I looked at the changes and they are beginning to look very good. Some
minor comments about comments in the individual patches.
--
Balbir
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists