[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0910112150020.638-100000@netrider.rowland.org>
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2009 21:54:23 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
cc: Ben Efros <ben@...doctor.com>, fangxiaozhi <huananhu@...wei.com>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
USB list <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
Hugh Blemings <hugh@...mings.org>,
Josua Dietze <digidietze@...isberghof.de>
Subject: Re: USB serial regression 2.6.31.1 -> 2.6.31.2 [PATCH]
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Don't those devices support SANE_SENSE fine on LUN 0 according to
> Alan parsing of my traces ?
Not really; the device returned only the usual 18 bytes of sense data.
But at least it did so correctly instead of failing.
> Heh, they may even work if I actually
> populate the SD-CARD slot, I'll try later.
Possibly, but I sure wouldn't bet on it. :-)
> I still think it's simpler and potentially more future-proof to just
> have a back-off scenario.
>
> Now, whether we ping pong the US_FL_SANE_SENSE flag or not is minor,
> I tend to think that your approach that doesn't touch the flag might
> indeed be better.
>
> I'll test the patch later today.
And of course there remains the question of why the serial driver
wasn't loaded and probed. Would it make a difference if that driver
was already loaded when you plugged in the modem?
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists