[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4AD3033C.8010503@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 19:21:48 +0900
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: cl@...ux-foundation.org
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
Subject: Re: [this_cpu_xx V6 3/7] Use this_cpu operations in slub
Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> cl@...ux-foundation.org wrote:
>> @@ -1507,7 +1498,7 @@ static inline void flush_slab(struct kme
>> */
>> static inline void __flush_cpu_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, int cpu)
>> {
>> - struct kmem_cache_cpu *c = get_cpu_slab(s, cpu);
>> + struct kmem_cache_cpu *c = per_cpu_ptr(s->cpu_slab, cpu);
>>
>> if (likely(c && c->page))
>> flush_slab(s, c);
>> @@ -1673,7 +1661,7 @@ new_slab:
>> local_irq_disable();
>>
>> if (new) {
>> - c = get_cpu_slab(s, smp_processor_id());
>> + c = __this_cpu_ptr(s->cpu_slab);
>
> Shouldn't this be this_cpu_ptr() without the double underscore?
Oh... another similar conversions in slab_alloc() and slab_free() too.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists