linux-kernel - Re: [Bug #14252] WARNING: at include/linux/skbuff.h:1382 w/ e1000

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20091012134421.1dcaf78b.skraw@ithnet.com>
Date:	Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:44:21 +0200
From:	Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@...net.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	rjw@...k.pl, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com, jesse.brandeburg@...el.com,
	peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com
Subject: Re: [Bug #14252] WARNING: at include/linux/skbuff.h:1382 w/ e1000

On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 03:49:19 -0700 (PDT)
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:

> From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
> Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 01:01:06 +0200 (CEST)
> 
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
> > 
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.  Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let me know (either way).
> > 
> > 
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14252
> > Subject		: WARNING: at include/linux/skbuff.h:1382 w/ e1000
> > Submitter	: Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@...net.com>
> > Date		: 2009-09-20 11:26 (22 days old)
> > References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125344599006033&w=4
> 
> Hmmm... e1000 calls skb_trim() on both jumbo and non-jumbo ring
> buffers which get recycled.
> 
> At least for the Jumbo case, that's illegal as you cannot call
> skb_trim() on an SKB with paged data.
> 
> But this assertion is triggering for the non-jumbo ring where
> only linear packets should be present as far as I can tell.
> 
> Some Intel folks need to take a look, CC:'d, and people need
> to CC: their networking bug reports to netdev@...r.kernel.org
> so that the proper folks see it.
> 
> Thanks.

Really, this was a lucky catch, because most of the time the box goes dead right away.
Don't interpret "most of the time" as "continously every day". It just happens sometimes. I am not that surprised because it's a box on the "frontline", you can find a lot of trash going on there, like:

Oct 12 12:21:01 box kernel: TCP: Peer 217.231.204.133:61124/80 unexpectedly shrunk window 2348821413:2348838837 (repaired)
Oct 12 12:21:02 box kernel: TCP: Peer 217.231.204.133:61124/80 unexpectedly shrunk window 2348821413:2348838837 (repaired)

-- 
Regards,
Stephan

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/