[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1255358181.9111.14.camel@macbook.infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 15:36:21 +0100
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Simon Kagstrom <simon.kagstrom@...insight.net>,
Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Koskinen Aaro (Nokia-D/Helsinki)" <aaro.koskinen@...ia.com>,
linux-mtd <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] panic.c: export panic_on_oops
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 16:26 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Not if the failure is say a s2ram hang that requires a power cycle. Also
> there are certain classes of bugs that only occur on cold boot. Plus
> there's the "need to unplug the battery to revive the system" class of
> bugs (but they are rare).
So you need to build in enough ECC to cope with the decay which happens
when RAM isn't being refreshed for a few seconds... :)
> So i think the MTD / flash stuff is powerful.
Yeah, definitely. I was just pointing out that we can actually do a lot
better on today's commodity hardware too.
--
dwmw2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists