[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0910010905340.5982@dr-wily.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 10:47:41 -0400 (EDT)
From: Tim Abbott <tabbott@...lice.com>
To: Greg Ungerer <gerg@...pgear.com>
cc: Greg Ungerer <gerg@...inux.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] m68knommu: Clean up linker script using new linker
script macros.
On Thu, 1 Oct 2009, Greg Ungerer wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
> Tim Abbott wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Tim Abbott <tabbott@...lice.com>
> > Cc: Greg Ungerer <gerg@...inux.org>
>
> This results in kernels that don't boot for me. I haven't done
> any more debugging than to just try booting at this time.
[...]
>
> Does that look like what you would have expected?
Basically. I'm a bit surprised that the .init_begin section doesn't show
up, but I'm pretty sure that this is because .init_begin would have had
size zero as the previous section's end was already page-aligned.
> I suspect the problem may lie in the binary conversion of this
> elf file to a raw binary for booting. This uses objcopy with
> "-O binary". The resulting binary files are different in size
> with and without the patch by about 2582 bytes. Suspicious
> me thinks.
I don't any good ideas for what in patch is likely to be responsible.
Would it be helpful to debug if I split this into ~5 very small patches so
that we can find out what part of the patch is responsible?
-Tim Abbott
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists