[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091012092331.45d7e71b@bike.lwn.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 09:23:31 -0600
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: Ben Nizette <bn@...sdigital.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Brownell <dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
dsilvers@...tec.co.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] GPIO: Add gpio_lookup
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 17:11:44 +1100
Ben Nizette <bn@...sdigital.com> wrote:
> Back to this patch though, the gpio names have to come from the platform
> code via some platform_data for the gpio chip [1], the driver then looks
> up that pre-defined name to find the gpio number. Why not just pass the
> gpio number straight to the end device driver through platform_data and
> bypass the middle-man?
That's true in a situation where you've one One Platform to Bind Them
All, yes. But if you have (say) GPIOs provided by a PCI-connected
peripheral which are needed in (say) a camera driver, there is no one
platform which can manage all those GPIO numbers. In particular, I've
done a driver for viafb-based GPIOs; these devices can show up in any
of a number of x86-based systems. I honestly don't know why it would
make sense to try to hardware numbers to these GPIOs when using names
and dynamic numbering is so much more flexible - and we are already
tracking the names.
Perhaps it would make sense to implement a proper namespace layer for
GPIOs rather than continuing to grow something which evidently sneaked
in through the back door. Until that's done, though, I think this
patch is useful. But it it's really unwanted I'll find some other way.
Thanks,
jon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists