linux-kernel - Re: [patch] perf build questions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 12 Oct 2009 08:34:33 -0700
From:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Kyle McMartin <kyle@...artin.ca>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] perf build questions

On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 10:47:34 +0200 Ingo Molnar wrote:

> 
> * Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com> wrote:
> 
> > All 64-bit userspace & kernel.  so that fails.  Thanks.
> 
> btw., i'm curious, what was/is your motivation for cross-building in 
> that way? On a 64-bit system you really want a 64-bit perf binary - it's 
> faster.

I'm just trying to build 64-bit and 32-bit RPMs.

Thanks.
---
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/