lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091012050534.GC7629@liondog.tnic>
Date:	Mon, 12 Oct 2009 07:05:34 +0200
From:	Borislav Petkov <petkovbb@...glemail.com>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the i7core_edac tree with Linus'
 tree

On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 02:23:28PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Today's linux-next merge of the i7core_edac tree got a conflict in
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c between commit
> f436f8bb73138bc74eb1c6527723e00988ad8a8a ("x86: EDAC: MCE: Fix MCE
> decoding callback logic") from Linus' tree and commit
> 699a7dbe1ffdf4b25c1475e45590b181c3e23087 ("edac_mce: Add an interface
> driver to report mce errors via edac") from the i7core_edac tree.

The current way Ingo suggested is using an atomic notifier instead
from within print_mce to convey MCE info to an EDAC driver, see
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125455310112745&w=2

Ingo, what are your plans with that? I'm guessing the .33 timeframe?

Thanks.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ