[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <x49hbu4semq.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:31:25 -0400
From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
To: Linux Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Subject: blkdev_issue_flush really issues a WRITE_BARRIER -- is that okay?
Hi,
While looking though Christoph's patch to call blkdev_issue_flush for
fsync on block devices, I noticed that it only issues a WRITE_BARRIER.
I don't see how that guarantees that data is on stable storage. Am I
missing something? Shouldn't this translate to a FLUSH CACHE or
SYNCHRONIZE CACHE command?
My apologies if this has been discussed before.
Thanks!
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists