[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091012193433.GB2691@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 21:34:33 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: SGU UV Fix irq affinity for hub based interrupts
* Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@....com> wrote:
> This patch fixes handling of uv hub irq affinity. IRQs with ALL or
> NODE affinity can be routed to cpus other than their originally assigned
> cpu. Those with CPU affinity cannot be rerouted.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@....com>
>
> ---
>
> More specific handling for NODE affinity will be added once the patch for
> limiting irq affinity is in place.
>
> arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_irq.h | 15 +++-
> arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c | 49 ++++++++++++-
Could we please move all these UV specific functions out of the generic
IO-APIC code? You can do it as a followup patch to this one, but i'd
like to see the end result first before applying these - the interfacing
is rather messy right now.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists