linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH tracing/kprobes v3 3/7] tracing/kprobes: Rename special variables

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 12 Oct 2009 17:36:56 -0400
From:	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>
To:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
CC:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	systemtap <systemtap@...rces.redhat.com>,
	DLE <dle-develop@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
	Jim Keniston <jkenisto@...ibm.com>,
	"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH tracing/kprobes v3 3/7] tracing/kprobes: Rename special
 variables

Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 05:20:09PM -0400, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>> Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>>> @@ -427,28 +427,17 @@ static int parse_probe_vars(char *arg, struct fetch_func *ff, int is_return)
>>>    	int ret = 0;
>>>    	unsigned long param;
>>>
>>> -	switch (arg[0]) {
>>> -	case 'a':	/* argument */
>>> -		ret = strict_strtoul(arg + 1, 10,&param);
>>> -		if (ret || param>   PARAM_MAX_ARGS)
>>> -			ret = -EINVAL;
>>> -		else {
>>> -			ff->func = fetch_argument;
>>> -			ff->data = (void *)param;
>>> -		}
>>> -		break;
>>> -	case 'r':	/* retval or retaddr */
>>> -		if (is_return&&   arg[1] == 'v') {
>>> +	if (strcmp(arg, "retval") == 0) {
>>> +		if (is_return) {
>>>    			ff->func = fetch_retvalue;
>>>    			ff->data = NULL;
>>>    		} else
>>>    			ret = -EINVAL;
>>> -		break;
>>> -	case 's':	/* stack */
>>> -		if (arg[1] == 'a') {
>>> +	} else if (strncmp(arg, "stack", 5) == 0) {
>>> +		if (arg[5] == '\0') {
>>>    			ff->func = fetch_stack_address;
>>>    			ff->data = NULL;
>>> -		} else {
>>> +		} else if (isdigit(arg[5])) {
>>>    			ret = strict_strtoul(arg + 1, 10,&param);
>>                                               ^^^^^^^ this should be arg + 5.
>>
>>> @@ -456,11 +445,18 @@ static int parse_probe_vars(char *arg, struct fetch_func *ff, int is_return)
>>>    				ff->func = fetch_stack;
>>>    				ff->data = (void *)param;
>>>    			}
>>> +		} else
>>> +			ret = -EINVAL;
>>> +	} else if (strncmp(arg, "arg", 3) == 0&&   isdigit(arg[4])) {
>
>
>
> And this should be isdigit(arg[3]) actually, what you want to test is the
> first character after arg, right?

Right. I'll fix it...


Thank you,

-- 
Masami Hiramatsu

Software Engineer
Hitachi Computer Products (America), Inc.
Software Solutions Division

e-mail: mhiramat@...hat.com

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/