[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091012064944.GA32027@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 08:49:44 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: tip tree question
* Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I noticed that the auto-latest branch of the tip tree (which is what
> is included in linux-next) has had the tip out-of-tree branch merged
> into it. [...]
That was unintended. tip:out-of-tree is like the tail section of -mm:
for useful but never-for-upstream patches.
Fixed it - thanks Stephen,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists