[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091013062939.GA8484@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 08:29:39 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
Cc: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] mce-inject: use injected mce only during faked
handler call
* Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com> wrote:
> I have talked with Ingo about this patch. But he has different idea
> about MCE log ring buffer and he didn't want to merge the patch even
> as an urgent bug fixes. It seems that another re-post can not convince
> him.
Correct. The fixes are beyond what we can do in .32 - and for .33 i
outlined (with a patch) that we should be using not just the ftrace
ring-buffer (like your patch did) but perf events to expose MCE events.
That brings MCE events to a whole new level of functionality.
Event injection support would be an interesting new addition to
kernel/perf_event.c: non-MCE user-space wants to inject events as well -
both to simulate rare events, and to define their own user-space events.
Is there any technical reason why we wouldnt want to take this far
superior approach?
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists