[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091013082427.GC7793@fluff.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 09:24:27 +0100
From: Ben Dooks <ben@...ff.org.uk>
To: sam@...nborg.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: spi-devel-general@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: changing module from single to multi-file build
I have a driver, drivers/spi/spi_s3c24xx.c in this case that I have
written an FIQ handler for which requires some assembly code. My attempts
at trying to change it so that I can build a single module with both the
C and ASM code linked together have not yet been a success.
The original makefile bit from drivers/spi/Makefile was:
obj-$(CONFIG_SPI_S3C24XX) += spi_s3c24xx.o
This allows it to work as a kernel builtin:
obj-$(CONFIG_SPI_S3C24XX) += spi_s3c24xx.o
obj-$(CONFIG_SPI_S3C24XX_FIQ) += spi_s3c24xx_fiq.o
I tried adding the following to the file, but this does not make
the FIQ code, I assume as there is still drivers/spi/spi_s3c24xx.c.
obj-spi_s3c24xx-y := spi_s3c24xx.o
obj-spi_s3c24xx-$(CONFIG_SPI_S3C24XX_FIQ) += spi_s3c24xx_fiq.o
Should I rename drivers/spi/spi_s3c24xx.c to something else to avoid
changing the module name, change the module name to avoid renaming the .c
to say spi_s3c24xx_hw (we have a gpio implementation, but that could easily
be removed in favour of gpiolib). Or is there something else that could
be done?
Note, I was initially against renaming the module, but with module autoload
working so well it seems easier to rename the module than try renaming the
.c file.
--
Ben (ben@...ff.org, http://www.fluff.org/)
'a smiley only costs 4 bytes'
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists