[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0910131027090.3781@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 10:27:53 +0200 (CEST)
From: John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>
To: Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@...il.com>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Vincent Sanders <vince@...tec.co.uk>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>,
Greg Ungerer <gerg@...inux.org>,
Koichi Yasutake <yasutake.koichi@...panasonic.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6 RFC] arch/blackfin/kernel/process.c: Remove the BKL
from sys_execve
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 18:33, John Kacur wrote:
> > This looks like a cut-and-paste job.
> > For example, compare this function to sys_execve in
> > arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
> >
> > and it is almost line by line the same, except the one in x86 nolonger has the
> > big kernel lock. All of the functions called between the lock are generic
> > and not specific to blackfin - thus, I believe it is safe to remove the
> > bkl here.
>
> and it still boots/runs fine, so np here
> Acked-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>
> -mike
Cool - are you testing on one of those nifty smp (or smp-like) blackfins?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists