[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1255444020.8392.362.camel@twins>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 16:27:00 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: bharata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>,
Herbert Poetzl <herbert@...hfloor.at>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Chris Friesen <cfriesen@...tel.com>,
Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
Mike Waychison <mikew@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 PATCH 4/8] sched: Enforce hard limits by throttling
On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 18:22 +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index 0f1ea4a..77ace43 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -1024,7 +1024,7 @@ struct sched_domain;
> struct sched_class {
> const struct sched_class *next;
>
> - void (*enqueue_task) (struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int wakeup);
> + int (*enqueue_task) (struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int wakeup);
> void (*dequeue_task) (struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int sleep);
> void (*yield_task) (struct rq *rq);
>
I really hate this, it uglfies all the enqueue code in a horrid way
(which is most of this patch).
Why can't we simply enqueue the task on a throttled group just like rt?
> @@ -3414,6 +3443,18 @@ int can_migrate_task(struct task_struct *p, struct rq *rq, int this_cpu,
> }
>
> /*
> + * Don't migrate the task if it belongs to a
> + * - throttled group on its current cpu
> + * - throttled group on this_cpu
> + * - group whose hierarchy is throttled on this_cpu
> + */
> + if (cfs_rq_throttled(cfs_rq_of(&p->se)) ||
> + task_group_throttled(task_group(p), this_cpu)) {
> + schedstat_inc(p, se.nr_failed_migrations_throttled);
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> * Aggressive migration if:
> * 1) task is cache cold, or
> * 2) too many balance attempts have failed.
Simply don't iterate throttled groups?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists