[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091013073511.297535e7@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 07:35:11 -0700
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Siarhei Liakh <sliakh.lkml@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@....de>, Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Aristeu Rozanski <aris@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5] x86: NX protection for kernel data
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 16:15:27 +0200
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>
> * Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 07:35:28 -0400
> > Siarhei Liakh <sliakh.lkml@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > > ---[ Kernel Mapping ]---
> > > 0xc0000000-0xc0100000 1M RW GLB x pte
> > > -0xc0100000-0xc048d000 3636K ro GLB x pte
> > > -0xc048d000-0xc04d0000 268K RW GLB x pte
> > > -0xc04d0000-0xc04d2000 8K RW GLB NX pte
> > > -0xc04d2000-0xc04d3000 4K RW GLB x pte
> > > -0xc04d3000-0xc0531000 376K RW GLB NX pte
> > > -0xc0531000-0xc0600000 828K RW GLB x pte
> > > +0xc0100000-0xc0381000 2564K ro GLB x pte
> > > +0xc0381000-0xc048d000 1072K ro GLB NX pte
> > > +0xc048d000-0xc0600000 1484K RW GLB NX pte
> > > 0xc0600000-0xf7800000 882M RW PSE GLB NX pmd
> > > 0xf7800000-0xf79fe000 2040K RW GLB NX pte
> > > 0xf79fe000-0xf7a00000 8K pte
> > > ===============================================
> > >
> >
> > looks great to me; the result is
> > * kernel is ro + x
> > * rodata is ro + NX
> > * data is RW + NX
> >
> > (and there is no "RW + x", other than the first megabyte... hmm.
> > maybe we need to look at that as well at some point)
>
> Could we cover the first megabyte too please via a (default-disabled)
> option? Modern Xorg shouldnt mind about that anymore, right?
just to be clear, for me this 1Mb is a seperate issue, and for a
separate patch.... the current patch is good as is.
--
Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists