linux-kernel - Re: [patch] perf_counter tools: remove expensive old debug code from perf top

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20091013144312.GE21809@ghostprotocols.net>
Date:	Tue, 13 Oct 2009 11:43:12 -0300
From:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
To:	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [patch] perf_counter tools: remove expensive old debug code
	from perf top

Em Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 04:41:59PM +0200, Mike Galbraith escreveu:
> On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 15:37 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Mike Galbraith <efault@....de> wrote:
> > 
> > > perf_counter tools: remove expensive old debug code from perf top
> > > 
> > > Calling gettimeofday() at high frequency is painful for handicapped 
> > > boxen. The spot calling gettimeofday() is old unneeded debug code, so 
> > > remove it.
> > 
> > Thanks!
> > 
> > We still seem to have a performance problem. Just running perf top on a 
> > 16-way box:
> > 
> >  Performance counter stats for 'perf top -e cycles -c 3000000':
> > 
> >      585.694831  task-clock-msecs         #      0.113 CPUs 
> >           35163  context-switches         #      0.060 M/sec
> >              17  CPU-migrations           #      0.000 M/sec
> >           20355  page-faults              #      0.035 M/sec
> >      1476952962  cycles                   #   2521.711 M/sec
> >       730770658  instructions             #      0.495 IPC  
> >        11489471  cache-references         #     19.617 M/sec
> >         2055001  cache-misses             #      3.509 M/sec
> > 
> >     5.169518576  seconds time elapsed
> > 
> > that's 11% of CPU time used on a single CPU - just displaying a measly 
> > 16K irqs/sec. Something's not quite right here.
> 
> I'll try to figure out why after I do some more wakeup preempt testing.
> 
> btw, something broke top annotation (again).  Module symbols still
> annotate, but vmlinux symbols went south.

I'll check this one, and I'm profiling perf top as well.

- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/