[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1255447980.3898.3.camel@x2.microgate.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 10:33:00 -0500
From: Paul Fulghum <paulkf@...rogate.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Nix <nix@...eri.org.uk>,
"Justin P. Mattock" <justinmattock@...il.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
Boyan <btanastasov@...oo.co.uk>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Ed Tomlinson <edt@....ca>,
Frédéric "L. W. Meunier" <fredlwm@...il.com>,
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [Bug #14388] keyboard under X with 2.6.31
On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 07:39 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> It's not a f*cking performance tweak, and you're ludicrous to claim it is.
> It's pointless, and it's making the code _slower_ rather than faster.
>
> Lookie here, Alan - the common sequence is crap like this:
>
> tty_buffer_request_room(tty, buf->size);
> tty_insert_flip_string(tty, buf->base, buf->size);
The performance tweak of tty_prepare_xxx is that you fill
the tty_buffer directly instead of writing data first to a staging
buffer and then calling tty_insert_flip_string, which just copies
from the staging buffer to the tty_buffer. So it saves a copy operation.
--
Paul Fulghum
Microgate Systems, Ltd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists