linux-kernel - Re: [this_cpu_xx V6 0/7] Introduce per cpu atomic operations and avoid per cpu address arithmetic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20091013160909.GB18716@csn.ul.ie>
Date:	Tue, 13 Oct 2009 17:09:09 +0100
From:	Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
To:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
Subject: Re: [this_cpu_xx V6 0/7] Introduce per cpu atomic operations and
	avoid per cpu address arithmetic

On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 11:45:44AM -0400, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Oct 2009, Mel Gorman wrote:
> 
> > FWIW, this fails to boot on latest mmotm on x86-64 even though the patches
> > apply. It fails to create basic slab cackes like kmalloc-64.
> 
> There was a fixup patch for one of the slub patches. Was that merged?
> 

No. I missed it without the change in subject line and had just exported
the thread series itself. Sorry.

I might have something useful on this in the morning assuming no other
PEBKAC-related messes.

-- 
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student                          Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick                         IBM Dublin Software Lab
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/