[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4AD4AEAA.2080209@goop.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 09:45:30 -0700
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de>
CC: akataria@...are.com, Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
Mike Christie <michaelc@...wisc.edu>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
"pv-drivers@...are.com" <pv-drivers@...are.com>,
Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
"Chetan.Loke@...lex.Com" <Chetan.Loke@...lex.Com>,
Daniel Walker <dwalker@...o99.com>,
Rolf Eike Beer <eike-kernel@...tec.de>,
Robert Love <robert.w.love@...el.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: SCSI driver for VMware's virtual HBA - V5.
On 10/13/09 07:35, James Bottomley wrote:
>> Yep, below is a patch with the rename, the driver is now called
>> vmw_pvscsi. Do let me know if you have any other comments. Thanks.
>>
> I'm still curious to know what the 'p' in the name stands for. Surely
> this is a fully virtual driver, not a paravirtual one?
>
I would assume that "pv" does stand for paravirtual. The terminology is
a bit screwy: "fully virtualized" means that the device looks like a
real hardware device that is being emulated. "Paravirtualized" means
that it is a completely virtual device which isn't an emulation of
anything; the guests know this this and talk to it accordingly.
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists