[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200910131952.01209.elendil@planet.nl>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 19:51:59 +0200
From: Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dirk Hohndel <hohndel@...radead.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, v2] kbuild: Improve version string logic
On Tuesday 13 October 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > IMO both LOCALVERSION_AUTO *and* the added "+" can be unsuitable for
> > some use cases, for example for distributions.
> >
> > If someone uses git to manage their custom patches, the only out this
> > patch leaves them to avoid the "+" is to revert it in their own trees.
>
> Is this a bad thing?
IMHO yes. This change essentially creates a backwards incompatibility with
existing naming schemes. Requiring to patch the change out to preserve an
existing naming scheme just seems a tad unfriendly.
But if I'm the only one who feels that way, go right ahead. You might
consider adding a comment in the Makefile as a pointer though.
I appreciate that you want this to be a strong default. Does Kconfig
support defining an option that can only be set by manually editing the
config and is not displayed as a config question?
If that is supported (or if support for that could be added), then that
might be a sufficiently obscure solution that experts would know how to
find, but would leave the vast majority of users using the default.
Cheers,
FJP
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists