| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20091013202036.GA5373@merkur.ravnborg.org> Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 22:20:36 +0200 From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org> To: Michael Tokarev <mjt@....msk.ru> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] kbuild fixes On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 11:19:52PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote: > Sam Ravnborg wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 12:41:42PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote: >>> Sam Ravnborg wrote: >>>> Hi Linus. >>>> >>>> A few kbuild related fixes. >>> [] >>>> - Fix use of echo -ne. Is caused issues for ubuntu (IIRC) users >>> As has been discussed previously (and Sam has been CC'ed), the fix >>> is still incorrect. >> >> In the thread hpa asked for a patch at least twice. >> Only after I submitted -fixes to Linus it shows up. >> >> Bad timing. >> >> And please - do not even think of asking me to do it. > > How many patches should one send? How many trees one should > compare against and send different patch for, in case such > an obvious trivial cases? If I'll provide this against > mainline, it wont apply to Sam's tree. mainline - a replacement patch would have been what I had expected to see. I took you patch and gave it a hopefully proper subject and applied it to kbuild-fixes.git. Sam -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists