[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091013204345.GA5135@nowhere>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 22:43:47 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] [PATCH 2/5] tracing: export symbols for kernel
lock tracepoints
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 04:33:51PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> From: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
>
> The big kernel lock tracepoints are used inside modules and they need
> to be exported accordingly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> ---
> lib/kernel_lock.c | 2 ++
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/kernel_lock.c b/lib/kernel_lock.c
> index 4ebfa5a..76f05bc 100644
> --- a/lib/kernel_lock.c
> +++ b/lib/kernel_lock.c
> @@ -139,3 +139,5 @@ void __lockfunc _unlock_kernel(const char *func, const char *file, int line)
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(_lock_kernel);
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(_unlock_kernel);
>
> +EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL(lock_kernel);
> +EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL(unlock_kernel);
> --
I remember when you showed me this patch, and it fixed a real
issue because we had the tracepoint call in smp_lock.h:
#define lock_kernel() \
trace_lock_kernel(__FUNC__, __FILE__, __LINE__); \
_lock_kernel(); \
So indeed the modules needed this missing export. But I had
to move the tracepoint calls to lib/kernel_lock.c instead,
because we had very bad headers dependencies.
So it's not needed anymore.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists