lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091013210208.GB5135@nowhere>
Date:	Tue, 13 Oct 2009 23:02:10 +0200
From:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] [PATCH 1/5] function-graph/x86: replace unbalanced
	ret with jmp

On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 04:33:50PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> From: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
> 
> The function graph tracer replaces the return address with a hook to
> trace the exit of the function call. This hook will finish by returning
> to the real location the function should return to.
> 
> But the current implementation uses a ret to jump to the real return
> location. This causes a imbalance between calls and ret. That is
> the original function does a call, the ret goes to the handler
> and then the handler does a ret without a matching call.
> 
> Although the function graph tracer itself still breaks the branch
> predictor by replacing the original ret, by using a second ret and
> causing an imbalance, it breaks the predictor even more.



I have troubles to understand by it breaks the predictor, especially
since there is not conditional branch in return_to_handler.
But still I don't understand why a ret would break more the branch
prediction than a jmp.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ