[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.00.0910140014490.26562@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 00:24:43 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>,
Dirk Hohndel <hohndel@...radead.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, v2] kbuild: Improve version string logic
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > I don't think you want to do that because it would require the .config
> > to be posted on bug reports, for example, to determine the setting of
> > CONFIG_LOCALVERSION_AUTO before you can interpret the kernel version.
> > In other words, you wouldn't know that "2.6.32-rc4" is actually 200
> > commits beyond the actual release unless you also know that the
> > .config has CONFIG_LOCALVERSION_AUTO="none".
>
> We've come a full circle ...
>
> That's the current !CONFIG_LOCALVERSION_AUTO status quo ... That was
> being asked to be preserved for (unspecified) packaging reasons. So
> your suggestion is to do away with that behavior altogether?
>
I don't think it's helpful to specify a version as "2.6.32-rc4" when in
reality it has 200 commits beyond the release and I like the addition of
`+' for !CONFIG_LOCALVERSION_AUTO if we're not at a tagged commit.
That's what my two patches do so the only time you could get a
"2.6.32-rc4" version string is for when it's the equivalent of
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/testing/linux-2.6.32-rc4.tar.bz2
(and you would actually get that regardless of whether you're using
CONFIG_LOCALVERSION_AUTO or not).
There's another possible extension that could be made: we could allow
LOCALVERSION= as passed to "make" to override the added `+' since it is
used to identify kernel versions by a string anyway; so make
LOCALVERSION=-slub_fixes would become v2.6.32-rc4-slub_fixes if
CONFIG_LOCALVERSION_AUTO were disabled, regardless of what commit we're
at, and v2.6.32-rc4-slub_fixes-00094-g80f5069 if it were enabled.
Regardless of future improvements, I think my two patches allow the kernel
version to more accurately describe what is running. That is predicated
on my belief that "v2.6.32-rc4", though, should never describe _anything_
except the kernel.org v2.6.32-rc4 kernel.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists