[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091014160748.GA13381@us.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 11:07:48 -0500
From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>
To: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, randy.dunlap@...cle.com,
arnd@...db.de, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
Containers <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Nathan Lynch <nathanl@...tin.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Louis.Rilling@...labs.com,
kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, mingo@...e.hu,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>, roland@...hat.com,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][v8][PATCH 0/10] Implement clone3() system call
Quoting Sukadev Bhattiprolu (sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com):
> H. Peter Anvin [hpa@...or.com] wrote:
> | >
> | > Except we can't use clone2() because it conflicts on ia64. Care to propose
> | > a name you would prefer?
>
> Yes, I am running out of ideas :-)
>
> How about clone64_with_pids() ? - hope we don't need a 65th clone-flag :p
Well, maybe accept that adding more flags will still require a new syscall,
and call this clone_with_pids(), and only take a single 32-bit flags field?
Or, go back to clone_extended().
-serge
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists