[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0910141420300.9708@gentwo.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 14:22:07 -0400 (EDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"rusty@...tcorp.com.au" <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"rostedt@...dmis.org" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"cebbert@...hat.com" <cebbert@...hat.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 13/16] percpu: remove per_cpu__ prefix.
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009, Luck, Tony wrote:
> But that would leave no visual indicator in the source
> code that a per-cpu variable was being used. E.g. in
> delayed_tlb_flush() we'd end up with:
we would still have to use per cpu operations to get to the contents of
these variables.
>
> if (unlikely(ia64_need_tlb_flush)) {
if (unlikely(this_cpu_read(ia64_need_tlb_flush))
> spin_lock ...
> if (ia64_need_tlb_flush) {
ditto.
> local_flush_tlb_all();
> ia64_need_tlb_flush = 0;
this_cpu_write(ia64_need_tlb_flush, 0);
> }
> spin_unlock ...
> }
>
Hope that addresses your concerns.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists