[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4AD555E2.4090904@zytor.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 21:38:58 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Oren Laadan <orenl@...columbia.edu>, serue@...ibm.com,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
mikew@...gle.com, mingo@...e.hu,
Nathan Lynch <nathanl@...tin.ibm.com>, arnd@...db.de,
peterz@...radead.org, Louis.Rilling@...labs.com,
kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, randy.dunlap@...cle.com,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
Containers <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
sukadev@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][v8][PATCH 0/10] Implement clone3() system call
On 10/13/2009 09:36 PM, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
>
> Would it help to use a type clone_flags_64_t to make the distinction
> between types more explicit ?
>
The problem with using the same flags in two places, one as a 32-bit and
one as a 64-bit number, is that using one in the wrong place will cause
silent, but deadly, truncation.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists