linux-kernel - Re: [patch 2/6] fs: no games with DCACHE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4AD6E7C9.5080001@gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 15 Oct 2009 11:13:45 +0200
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
CC:	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/6] fs: no games with DCACHE_UNHASHED

Nick Piggin a écrit :

> So what if we were to do this first? Are there any other reasons I've
> missed? (btw. this changes the format the link if that is a problem.
> Probably if we're going to do this change, we should change things like
> [timerfd] to just timerfd while we're there to improve consistency
> further.
> --
> Pipe and socket pseudo filesystems report their file descriptor link
> paths as pipe:[ino] and socket:[ino]. anon_inodefs allows subsystems
> to specify a name, but it does not report an associated inode number.
> 
> Implement this with anon_inodefs_dname in the same way pipefs and sockfs
> are.
> 
> ---
>  fs/anon_inodes.c |   10 ++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> 
> Index: linux-2.6/fs/anon_inodes.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/fs/anon_inodes.c
> +++ linux-2.6/fs/anon_inodes.c
> @@ -45,6 +45,15 @@ static int anon_inodefs_delete_dentry(st
>  	return 1;
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * anon_inodefs_dname() is called from d_path().
> + */
> +static char *anon_inodefs_dname(struct dentry *dentry, char *buffer, int buflen)
> +{
> +	return dynamic_dname(dentry, buffer, buflen, "%s:[%lu]",
> +				dentry->d_name.name, dentry->d_inode->i_ino);
> +}
> +
>  static struct file_system_type anon_inode_fs_type = {
>  	.name		= "anon_inodefs",
>  	.get_sb		= anon_inodefs_get_sb,
> @@ -52,6 +61,7 @@ static struct file_system_type anon_inod
>  };
>  static const struct dentry_operations anon_inodefs_dentry_operations = {
>  	.d_delete	= anon_inodefs_delete_dentry,
> +	.d_dname	= anon_inodefs_dname,
>  };
>  
>  /*

Yes, that would be fine, thanks Nick.

Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/