[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1255598554.2304.1.camel@castor>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 10:22:34 +0100
From: Richard Kennedy <richard@....demon.co.uk>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Martin Bligh <mbligh@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: bdi_threshold slow to reach steady state
On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 16:04 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 14:55 +0100, Richard Kennedy wrote:
> >
> > commit 11735a2336ba08cf21aebf79a706c86aca5e44b2
> > Author: Richard Kennedy <richard@....demon.co.uk>
> > Date: Wed Oct 14 14:46:21 2009 +0100
> >
> > mm: speed up per bdi dirty threshold calculations
>
> I think the subject is confusing, we don't actually compute things
> faster in the less cycles sense.
>
> We reduce the dampening for the control system, yielding faster
> convergence.
Ah yes, sorry about that. That was a bit of a placeholder.
I'll write a proper change log & re-post.
regards
Richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists