| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <tip-37c72e56f6b234ea7387ba530434a80abf2658d8@git.kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 09:24:52 GMT
From: "tip-bot for Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, npiggin@...e.de,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...hat.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: [tip:core/rcu] rcu: Prevent RCU IPI storms in presence of high call_rcu() load
Commit-ID: 37c72e56f6b234ea7387ba530434a80abf2658d8
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/37c72e56f6b234ea7387ba530434a80abf2658d8
Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
AuthorDate: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 10:15:55 -0700
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CommitDate: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 11:17:16 +0200
rcu: Prevent RCU IPI storms in presence of high call_rcu() load
As the number of callbacks on a given CPU rises, invoke
force_quiescent_state() only every blimit number of callbacks
(defaults to 10,000), and even then only if no other CPU has
invoked force_quiescent_state() in the meantime.
This should fix the performance regression reported by Nick.
Reported-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: laijs@...fujitsu.com
Cc: dipankar@...ibm.com
Cc: mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca
Cc: josh@...htriplett.org
Cc: dvhltc@...ibm.com
Cc: niv@...ibm.com
Cc: peterz@...radead.org
Cc: rostedt@...dmis.org
Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com
Cc: jens.axboe@...cle.com
LKML-Reference: <12555405592133-git-send-email->
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
---
kernel/rcutree.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
kernel/rcutree.h | 4 ++++
2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
index 705f02a..ddbf111 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
@@ -958,7 +958,7 @@ static void rcu_offline_cpu(int cpu)
* Invoke any RCU callbacks that have made it to the end of their grace
* period. Thottle as specified by rdp->blimit.
*/
-static void rcu_do_batch(struct rcu_data *rdp)
+static void rcu_do_batch(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_data *rdp)
{
unsigned long flags;
struct rcu_head *next, *list, **tail;
@@ -1011,6 +1011,13 @@ static void rcu_do_batch(struct rcu_data *rdp)
if (rdp->blimit == LONG_MAX && rdp->qlen <= qlowmark)
rdp->blimit = blimit;
+ /* Reset ->qlen_last_fqs_check trigger if enough CBs have drained. */
+ if (rdp->qlen == 0 && rdp->qlen_last_fqs_check != 0) {
+ rdp->qlen_last_fqs_check = 0;
+ rdp->n_force_qs_snap = rsp->n_force_qs;
+ } else if (rdp->qlen < rdp->qlen_last_fqs_check - qhimark)
+ rdp->qlen_last_fqs_check = rdp->qlen;
+
local_irq_restore(flags);
/* Re-raise the RCU softirq if there are callbacks remaining. */
@@ -1224,7 +1231,7 @@ __rcu_process_callbacks(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_data *rdp)
}
/* If there are callbacks ready, invoke them. */
- rcu_do_batch(rdp);
+ rcu_do_batch(rsp, rdp);
}
/*
@@ -1288,10 +1295,20 @@ __call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, void (*func)(struct rcu_head *rcu),
rcu_start_gp(rsp, nestflag); /* releases rnp_root->lock. */
}
- /* Force the grace period if too many callbacks or too long waiting. */
- if (unlikely(++rdp->qlen > qhimark)) {
+ /*
+ * Force the grace period if too many callbacks or too long waiting.
+ * Enforce hysteresis, and don't invoke force_quiescent_state()
+ * if some other CPU has recently done so. Also, don't bother
+ * invoking force_quiescent_state() if the newly enqueued callback
+ * is the only one waiting for a grace period to complete.
+ */
+ if (unlikely(++rdp->qlen > rdp->qlen_last_fqs_check + qhimark)) {
rdp->blimit = LONG_MAX;
- force_quiescent_state(rsp, 0);
+ if (rsp->n_force_qs == rdp->n_force_qs_snap &&
+ *rdp->nxttail[RCU_DONE_TAIL] != head)
+ force_quiescent_state(rsp, 0);
+ rdp->n_force_qs_snap = rsp->n_force_qs;
+ rdp->qlen_last_fqs_check = rdp->qlen;
} else if ((long)(ACCESS_ONCE(rsp->jiffies_force_qs) - jiffies) < 0)
force_quiescent_state(rsp, 1);
local_irq_restore(flags);
@@ -1523,6 +1540,8 @@ rcu_init_percpu_data(int cpu, struct rcu_state *rsp, int preemptable)
rdp->beenonline = 1; /* We have now been online. */
rdp->preemptable = preemptable;
rdp->passed_quiesc_completed = lastcomp - 1;
+ rdp->qlen_last_fqs_check = 0;
+ rdp->n_force_qs_snap = rsp->n_force_qs;
rdp->blimit = blimit;
spin_unlock(&rnp->lock); /* irqs remain disabled. */
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.h b/kernel/rcutree.h
index b40ac57..599161f 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree.h
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.h
@@ -167,6 +167,10 @@ struct rcu_data {
struct rcu_head *nxtlist;
struct rcu_head **nxttail[RCU_NEXT_SIZE];
long qlen; /* # of queued callbacks */
+ long qlen_last_fqs_check;
+ /* qlen at last check for QS forcing */
+ unsigned long n_force_qs_snap;
+ /* did other CPU force QS recently? */
long blimit; /* Upper limit on a processed batch */
#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists