[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4AD6EB08.9070303@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 18:27:36 +0900
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
mingo@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, hpa@...or.com, cebbert@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/16] percpu: make access macros universal
Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Oct 2009, Tejun Heo wrote:
>
>> @@ -182,17 +185,19 @@ static inline void *pcpu_lpage_remapped(void *kaddr)
>> #ifndef percpu_read
>> # define percpu_read(var) \
>> ({ \
>> - typeof(var) __tmp_var__; \
>> - __tmp_var__ = get_cpu_var(var); \
>> - put_cpu_var(var); \
>> - __tmp_var__; \
>> + typeof(var) *pr_ptr__ = &(var); \
>> + typeof(var) pr_ret__; \
>> + pr_ret__ = get_cpu_var(*pr_ptr__); \
>> + put_cpu_var(*pr_ptr__); \
>> + pr_ret__; \
>> })
>> #endif
>
> == this_cpu_read(var) ?
Yeah, all these extra and duplicate accessors need to go away. Once
dust around this patchset settles down. That's the next thing to do.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists