linux-kernel - Re: [patch 6/7] um: Convert mmapper to unlocked

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200910151500.34820.arnd@arndb.de>
Date:	Thu, 15 Oct 2009 15:00:34 +0200
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arndbergmann@...glemail.com>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	ALan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 6/7] um: Convert mmapper to unlocked_ioctl

On Thursday 15 October 2009, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> The ioctl is empty and needs no serialization. We might remove it
> completely but that would change the return value from -ENOIOCTLCMD to
> -ENOTTY.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Cc: Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>

This one is tricky if you want to get it right according to the
book. ENOIOCTLCMD is never a valid return code for user space,
but sys_ioctl passes it down anyway.

However, returning -ENOIOCTLCMD from an *unlocked_ioctl* function
automatically gets turned into -EINVAL. It does this to allow
the same functions to be used for unlocked_ioctl and compat_ioctl.
In effect, this patch is functionally identical to removing the
ioctl function, which I think is what should be done here.

	Arnd <><
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/