[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.01.0910150901190.6146@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 09:04:09 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Paul Fulghum <paulkf@...rogate.com>,
Boyan <btanastasov@...oo.co.uk>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Ed Tomlinson <edt@....ca>,
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [Bug #14388] keyboard under X with 2.6.31
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> Actually, this looks simple. Please see the patch below.
Ok, I should have read all my emails before responding to the previous
one.
But my response ends up being the same: I think your patch is fine, and I
think you should drop the conditional flag. I don't think anybody _ever_
wants to run the same work entry on multiple CPU's at once. Anybody who
wants parallelism needs to use multiple work entries _anyway_ (since the
accidental parallelism you *can* get with a single one is really very
accidental indeed).
Of course, it should be tested in -next for a while regardless. And talk
to the networkng people, who are the main user of workqueues.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists