[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1255623129.22917.41.camel@desktop>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 09:12:09 -0700
From: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...o99.com>
To: Gregory Haskins <gregory.haskins@...il.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Tips for module_init() dependencies
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 11:58 -0400, Gregory Haskins wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Possibly.
>
> A) Any suggestions on how? Can I express this in Kconfig or something
> (i.e. "depends on FOO"). I currently have "select FOO" in the BAR
> object, but this doesn't seem to be sufficient to describe the relationship.
>
> B) Do I have to make the entire chain follow suit? (I have C deps on B,
> B deps on A kind of scenarios)
Yeah, what Randy said .. As far as I know it should be just a build
order issue .. In the make file when you specify your new module along
with all the others where you put it is actually important .. In
fs/Makefile you have this line,
obj-$(CONFIG_CONFIGFS_FS) += configfs/
and I would guess you want yours after that line if your adding to that
makefile.
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists