[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4AD75920.8000303@zytor.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 10:17:20 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ian Lance Taylor <iant@...gle.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: linker script syntax nits
On 10/14/2009 11:38 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> We could introduce a COMPAT_ASSERT() wrapper perhaps, to move it more in
> line with the 'official' syntax.
>
> Or we could wrap ASSERT() itself (this runs through the preprocessor
> before going to the linker) - although that would be a pretty obfuscated
> move.
>
> At minimum we should add a comment to the first use of ASSERT() here
> that we assign the current address due to compatibility reasons. (same
> goes for arch/x86/boot/setup.ld)
>
> Anyway - any such cleanup would be .33 material.
>
The tricky part about wrapping ASSERT() is that you have to have a sink
for the old versions of ld. We use . as the sink, but that changes .
which you don't want to do silently.
The other -- and somewhat less cantankerous way -- is to use a dummy symbol:
#define LINUX_ASSERT(expr, name, string) name = ASSERT(expr, string)
"name" would have to be unique for each instance.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists