[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4AD77007.2070706@freescale.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:55:03 -0500
From: Timur Tabi <timur@...escale.com>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
CC: Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
brueckner@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hvc_console: returning 0 from put_chars is not an error
Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Hmmm, if we are ok with having both options, we should let the hvc backend
> decide if it wants to drain or to discard.
>
> If we just busy loop, it actually does not matter how we let hvc_console react
> on 0, as long as we adopt all backends to use that interface consistent.
>
> On the other hand, backends might want to do special magic on congestion so I
> personally tend to let the backend loop instead of hvc_console. But I am really
> not sure.
The reason that we're asking for this change is that I have an hvc client driver that drops characters during heavy printk() output. hvc calls my driver, but the output buffer is still full, so the driver just returns 0.
If I add a spin-loop in the driver, then we don't need to change hvc, but now the driver is blocking during user-space print operations (via hvc_write and hvc_push).
--
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists