[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4AD775BA.30704@goop.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 12:19:22 -0700
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@...cle.com>
CC: Xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>, kurt.hackel@...cle.com,
arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@...hat.com>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, chris.mason@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 05/12] xen/pvclock: add monotonicity check
On 10/15/09 06:27, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
> I understand but you are now essentially emulating a
> reliable platform timer with a potentially unreliable
> (but still high resolution) per-CPU timer AND probably
> delivering that result to userland.
>
> Read_tsc should only be used if either CONSTANT_TSC
> or TSC_RELIABLE is true, so read_tsc is guaranteed
> to be monotonically-strictly-increasing by hardware
> (and enforced for CONSTANT_TSC by check_tsc_warp
> at boot).
>
read_tsc clearly isn't expected to produce absolutely globally monotonic
results; if it were then the check wouldn't be necessary.
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists